DNA India found the film mediocre overall but strongly praised Tiger Shroff, whose dancing, action and physical presence provide most of the entertainment value.

Hindustan Times found the film thoroughly mediocre, criticising its lack of drama, believable conflict and narrative tension, with style and attractive stars replacing meaningful storytelling.

Koimoi strongly disliked the sequel, criticising its empty story, weak acting, poor music and lazy writing, and considered the entire exercise unnecessary.

BollywoodLife found it lightweight but reasonably entertaining for undemanding viewers, appreciating Tiger Shroff, Ananya Panday and the glossy fun while acknowledging its lack of substance.

Bollywood Hungama was distinctly positive, calling the film entertaining and enjoyable, and praising Tiger Shroff, Ananya Panday, the improved second half and engaging climax.

News18's Rajeev Masand found the film predictable and unnecessary, saying its lack of originality and emotional grounding makes it difficult to care about the characters or their conflicts.

Filmibeat found the film superficial and illogical despite its glossy visuals, dancing and attractive cast, concluding that the weak writing makes this class easy to skip.

Times of India found it a breezy and visually polished entertainer, enjoying the friendship, sport and campus drama, though the romance and emotional connection were weak.

India TV News strongly criticised the film, finding the new batch of students boring and the glamorous presentation unable to rescue an unconvincing story.

India Today was highly negative, criticising the shallow story, weak performances, forgettable music and glaring lack of logic, while acknowledging Tiger Shroff's physical skills.